The Cycle of Deprivation and Affluence
Summary
*Source: TH* *Subject: Poverty and Inequality* **Context:** A recent longitudinal analysis of income mobility in India between 2014 and 2025 reveals a troubling trend where downward mobility is outpacing upward climbs. • The study highlights that the share of households slipping into lower income brackets nearly doubled, reaching **8% by 2025**. **About ****The Cycle of Deprivation and Affluence****:** **What it is?** • The Cycle of Deprivation and Affluence refers to the continuous and oft
This article hasn't been rewritten for exam prep yet. Showing original content.
Source Article Content
Source: TH
Subject: Poverty and Inequality
Context: A recent longitudinal analysis of income mobility in India between 2014 and 2025 reveals a troubling trend where downward mobility is outpacing upward climbs.
• The study highlights that the share of households slipping into lower income brackets nearly doubled, reaching 8% by 2025. About The Cycle of Deprivation and Affluence:
What it is?
• The Cycle of Deprivation and Affluence refers to the continuous and often volatile movement of households across different income strata. • It captures income mobility—the ability of a family to improve its financial standing (upward mobility) or its vulnerability to economic shocks that push it into poverty (downward mobility). Key Data & Facts:
• Doubling of Downward Mobility: The percentage of households moving to a lower income group rose from 14% in 2015 to 26.8% in 2025. • Rural Distress: By 2025, nearly 29% of rural households were worse off than they were in 2014, significantly higher than their urban counterparts. • Stagnant Middle: The share of households remaining in the same income group fell from 70% to below 50%, indicating a massive social churn. Key Reasons for the Rise of Inequality:
• Informal Sector Neglect: A lack of a coherent strategy to revive agriculture and small-scale industries has left the bulk of the workforce vulnerable. E.g. The persistent distress in the MSME sector post-pandemic has limited the living wage opportunities for millions of semi-skilled workers.
• Impact of COVID-19: Inept handling of the pandemic’s economic aftermath caused a disruption that persisted long after the health crisis ended. E.g. The K-shaped recovery saw tech and finance sectors boom while service-sector workers in tourism and retail faced permanent income shifts.
• Educational Barriers: Unequal access to quality higher education prevents disadvantaged groups from entering high-productivity sectors. E.g. The reliance on precarious contractual teaching in state universities has diluted the quality of education for non-elite students.
• Social Discrimination: Entrenched biases against Muslims and SCs restrict their upward mobility pathways. E.g. Low representation of marginalized groups in senior corporate leadership roles reflects the glass ceiling in the private sector.
• Urban-Centric Growth: Economic gains are concentrated in major metropolitan hubs, leaving the rural heartland exposed to volatility. E.g. The boom in Real Estate and High-End Tech in cities like Bengaluru contrasts sharply with stagnant crop prices in the agrarian belts of UP and Bihar.
Challenges Associated with Reduced Mobility
• Social Instability: When more households slip down the ladder than climb up, frustration replaces aspiration, leading to civil unrest. E.g. Frequent protests over government job recruitment (like the Agnipath or Railway exams) signal deep-seated youth anxiety.
• Human Development Setbacks: Downward mobility is directly linked to increased infant mortality and morbidity. E.g. Higher malnutrition rates in districts with high income volatility suggest that families cut back on essential proteins when income dips.
• Weak Aggregate Demand: A population trapped in survival mode cannot sustain the consumption levels needed for 8% GDP growth. E.g. The anemic sales of entry-level two-wheelers compared to luxury SUVs indicates a hollowed-out middle-class purchasing power.
• Entrenched Poverty Traps: Inequality makes it harder for the next generation to break the cycle through merit alone. E.g. The rising cost of private coaching for competitive exams makes merit an affordable luxury for the affluent only.
• Policy Paralysis: Relying on headline growth figures masks the micro-level suffering of a quarter of the population. E.g. Claims of falling multidimensional poverty sit uneasily with the reality of 80 crore people requiring free food grains (PMGKAY).
Way Ahead:
• Strengthen Public Infrastructure: Prioritize high-quality public health and education to reduce out-of-pocket expenses that trigger downward mobility. • Revive the Informal Sector: Implement targeted credit and technology support for MSMEs to create stable, employment-intensive growth. • Social Protection Reform: Transition from honoraria-based community work to formal, salaried roles with social security for frontline workers. • Address Spatial Inequality: Invest in tier-2 and tier-3 cities to de-congest metros and provide localized mobility pathways for rural youth. • Anti-Discrimination Frameworks: Actively monitor and address caste and religious biases in the labor market to ensure Equal Pay for Equal Work. Conclusion:
The data from 2014-25 serves as a stark reminder that headline GDP growth is an insufficient measure of national well-being if one in four households is slipping into deprivation. To maintain social harmony, India must shift from a model of elite-led indulgence to one of broad-based inclusion that rewards resilience with actual upward mobility.
Q. “High inequality is not just unjust — it is developmentally inefficient.” Examine how rising inequality distorts policy outcomes in India. Evaluate the risk it poses to sustainable human development. (10 M)